About lingoXpress

Who runs lingoXpress

lingoXpress is built and run by Edward Leoni, an independent developer. It is not backed by a publisher or a language school. There is no team of staff lexicographers behind it, and this page exists partly so you never have to guess about that.

Why it's free

The site is paid for by advertising. You do not need an account to use the games, the courses, the conjugation tables or the word of the day. An account only exists so your progress, bookmarks and daily email can follow you between devices.

How the material is made

Most of what you read here is generated by AI language models, and we would rather tell you that plainly than let you work it out. Word of the Day entries — the definition, the example sentences, the pronunciation guide and the usage note — are produced by a model, one entry per language per day. Conjugation tables are generated and then checked by a second model prompted to review every form for accuracy, before a further set of automated rules cleans up known failure modes.

Some parts of the site are not AI-generated at all. The constructed-language dictionaries are free and openly available lexicographic data, where possible credited on each page to the source it came from. The books and media we list are real published works.

What that means for accuracy

AI-generated material is fluent, which makes its mistakes harder to spot than a typo would be. A pronunciation guide can be plausible and wrong. A word listed as a synonym can turn out to be a different grammatical form. We do not claim that a human has checked every entry — at this scale, that would not be true, and a claim we cannot back is worth less than an honest limit.

So treat lingoXpress as a place to meet words and practise them, not as a citation. For anything that has to be exactly right — an exam answer, a tattoo, a legal document — check a dictionary published by people who do that for a living.

When you find a mistake

Tell us. Every Word of the Day entry has a “Report a mistake” link. Pick what is wrong, add a sentence if you can, and it goes to a moderation queue that a human reads. Reports that hold up are published on the entry itself, credited to you, so the next reader sees both the correction and the fact that the entry has been questioned.

This is the review layer. It is reader-driven rather than editorial, and we would rather show you that openly on the page than quietly patch things and imply the entry was always right.

Getting in touch

For anything that is not a specific correction, use the contact page. Talk to us